The Intersection of Art and Science, Chapman Universty 2024
Art and Science have long been pitted against each other, seemingly signifying two contradictory sides of the brain; objectivity and creativity. Ideologies that were present in the Renaissance celebrated the conjunction of the two disciplines, resulting in scientists who incorporated truth and beauty into their scientific practices, and artists that had a scientific understanding of the natural world in order to depict it. Today, Scientists use the same invention and curiosity that fuel artistic practice to understand and explain the world around them and contemporary artists respond visually and conceptually to new discoveries in science. This studio class offers the argument that science and art can be interconnected in concept and practice. Students will explore the ways visual systems of representation in art can intersect with contemporary science in various ways to using science as the subject matter or inspiration of the work made in class. Students will draw inspiration from scientific images and speak with scientists and designers of the current projects at NASA’s Jet Propulsion Laboratory.
When thinking about the concept expressed during class which was “art comes first and science always catches up,” the first example that comes to mind is Leonardo Da Vinci’s Vitruvian Man (1490), anatomical drawings and configurations that detailed how the male body was constructed. These drawings ahead of the medical discoveries of that time period were one of the many things that fused art and science during the renaissance, steering away from the religious. Not only ahead of medical discoveries at the time but Da Vinci was also thinking about proportions that had not been thought of before, thinking about how we are in relation to space. Da Vinci has long been known to the public as the one who painted The Mona Lisa but he also led a series of studies of human cadavers, learning how the body worked, was an incredible engineer, architect, and mathematician. In this week’s reading, Art and Science Dialogue, the author mentions how the greatest artists were also scientists and vice versa (pg. 16, Strosberg) those who can find the intersections between art and science are the ones who excel in their field because of the creativity and liberty that they find in unifying these two seemingly disparate subjects.
ReplyDeleteA Contemporary artist that I found to be a fascinating and successful intersection of art and science was Janet Saad-Cook who creates sun drawings with sunlight, time, motion and reflection. Working with scientists, engineers and architects she learns to reflect the sun’s light with dyed glass and metals specifically designed for these reflections. By incorporating the sun’s rotation and position in the galaxy, she creates these illustrious sun drawings that contain such delicate and mesmerizing colors and composition. These pieces are a successful intersection of art and science because of how she interacts with the natural world through these singular windows in homes that are geometric, creating a contrast and harmony between nature and what is manmade.
While comparing the two artists, we see how each of them approached science in a manner befitting their time which led them to creating a successful intersection between art and science. During Da Vinci’s time, an accurate depiction of the body, something studied, rehearsed and planned, was what art was. His paintings all involved sketches to figure out the perfect proportions and details so that the painting would succeed perfectly while Janet, living a post modernism world, had a different perspective on how to incorporate science into her artwork. It no longer became a way to achieve a higher sense of perfection and observation but instead a way of allowing her to observe how we find ourselves compared to the greater life of the universe while also giving homage to techniques and behaviors done by the earliest humans. Da Vinci’s drawings and Saad-Cook’s drawings side by side are also an interesting contrast between something very geometrical and analytical and something natural and organic. While two different interpretations of the intersection of art and science, they both find a way to create beautiful and great pieces using science to achieve it.
The most successful intersections of art and science are where both are innovating a new approach to understanding the world. This is especially true when both fields inspire each other, such as artists using scientific knowledge and methods to expand the limits of their creativity and scientists using art to act as visualization and a sense of communication with the world.
ReplyDeleteA historical example of art and science intersecting is the artist, scientist and inventor Leonardo da Vinci. His artwork reflected his knowledge of anatomy, engineering, and botany. Especially within his well-known drawing ‘Vitruvian Man’ that exhibited the proportions and anatomy of a human but not only that in Da Vinci’s sketchbook also featured detailed anatomical drawings based on dissections, which was evolutionary to the idea that humans are a microcosm of the universe, bridging in art and science. In fact, Leonardo was not just interested in the structural anatomy of the human body. Still, Da Vinci was also interested in the conception and growth within the stages of life, how that forms into the expression of emotions and the nature of the senses. Leonardo tried to study the human nervous system to conduct an experiment linking the nervous system to how a human conducts emotion, yet, unfortunately, not much came out of that hypothesis due to a lack of material. But Da Vinci’s most robust understanding was in human autonomy as he could conduct autopsies on more than thirty humans, and the intense studying that he did genuinely reflected onto his drawings and later served as a physical documentation of the connections across two disciplines, art and science.
A contemporary creative team that bridges art and science in their works is Studio Drift, a duo of two artists, Lonneke Gordijn and Ralph Nauta. This team merges modern technology with nature and art to create immersive and provoking installations; its works are mainly drawn from scientific principles, engineering, and natural processes to learn from the Earth’s natural mechanisms and re-establish our connection to our planet. Their main goal in creating their artwork is to raise fundamental questions about life and explore an optimistic scenario for the future. For example, one of their pieces called ‘Franchise Freedom” (2017) is an installation featuring a swarm of three hundred drones mimicking the flight patterns of starlings. This piece installed the drones to create motion mimicking the behaviour of a swarm found in nature, displaying memorizing traction in the sky. The ‘Franchise Freedom’ (2017) project intended to question the human concept of freedom and social construct, presenting how humans strive to live autonomously within societies defined by rules and conventions and questioning our conception of individual freedom.
To conclude, Leonardo da Vinci combined his artistic and scientific talents within his artwork and research to integrate the understanding of art and science. Studio Drift continues to create contemporary art, combining science and technology to reflect on the relationship between humans and nature. Both exemplify the intersection of art and science that continues to push traditional boundaries and leads to new ways of thinking and experiencing the world in its present and future forms.
This comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDelete
ReplyDeleteArt and science exist as separate disciplines while simultaneously being intertwined on a fundamental level. While seemingly opposing, the processes, methods, and objectives of both fields are identical. This connection, beginning at the origins of both areas of study, has laid the foundation for some of the most pivotal inventions in the arts and sciences. Some of the most notable are seen within the medical field. Art is a crucial part of medical research, surgical planning, patient and student education, and more. Medicine has always depended on aspects of art to further develop, explain, and illustrate findings.
The art and medicine link is not a recent connection, the ties have existed since the beginning of time. Leonardo De Vinci, one of the most influential and well known names in art, is a prime example of this. De Vinci created highly rendered sketches of human anatomy. These sketches didn’t just capture the exterior human body; they detailed the precise inner workings of the skeletal, muscular, and nervous systems, as well as dental anatomy. De Vinci also created drawings of neonatal and fetal processes within the female reproductive system. Through the accuracy and precision of these drawings, De Vinci depicted the complexities of human anatomy. Making invaluable contributions to our knowledge of the human body and its biological processes. Since De Vinci, medical illustrations have become a prominent component in medical education and the healthcare industry.
The overlap between art and science proceeds, Susan Aldworth is a prime example of this. Since the beginning of her career, Aldworth has been making work dedicated to understanding and exploring the human form, specifically the brain. Aldworth studies the connection between the physical nature of the human brain and the conscious mind. Her work “Passing Thoughts”(2013) is a series of 15 photographs of the human brain. These brain scans depict the activity as well as the unique qualities of the human brain. Aldworth furthers this exploration through “Transcendence,” (2013) a collection of etchings created directly on the tissue of a human brain. These prints examine the fragility of the brain and the variety of threats it is susceptible to. Aldworth views these brain scans as self-portraits, acknowledging the individuality that comes with each scan, each brain, and each person. Furthermore, Aldworth’s exhibition “Modern Alchemy”(2023) explores the use of material within modern chemistry practices. Through this work, Aldworth experiments with the use of common metals, as opposed to sparse materials, and studies their chemical reactions. This experimentation aided scientists in mimicking reaction results and made leeway in the improvement of sustainability within chemistry.
The two disciplines continue to merge, sharing practices, findings, methods, and theories to develop one another. Aldworth and De Vinci, while highly impactful, are just a small portion of the interconnection between science and art. Their discoveries hugely impacted the development of their fields and the progression of their work, blurring the lines between artist and scientist.
One of the most successful intersections of art and science is how we learn to not just understand and but visualize the mind and body and how they work. The medical field in itself is a great blend of art and science due to having to solve, create, and occasionally improvise and think outside the box. Scientific research has led us to understand different things that happen within the human brain. By combining science and art, we have been able to visualize some of the experiences through brain scans. One disability we began to understand that many people were unaware of in the past is synesthesia. Synesthesia is what happens when someone is doing something with one sense and associates it with a different sense. Some examples of synesthesia are having colors associated with music, sounds with words, colors with words, etc.
ReplyDeleteThere are many artists who would now be diagnosed with having synesthesia. One of these artists was Wassily Kandinsky. Kandinsky was both an artist and music composer. His synesthesia influenced his work greatly. Kandinsky’s type of synesthesia was chromesthesia. This meant that he saw colors when he heard music and music with colors. Many of his paintings were coincidentally titled as “composition __”. The paintings he would create were not just for a visual aesthetic, he was composing with each brush stroke.
A modern practice that emulates synesthesia is an EEG monitor. The EEG monitor is worn and scans the brainwaves and creates a digital visualized reaction to what the person is looking at, listening to, or eating. In 2023, the Smithsonian Museum had some of its guests put on an EEG monitor to record what happens in their brain while looking at art. This experiment was specific towards learning what the different reactions were when viewing Van Gogh paintings coming from viewers of different ages.
A woman who shares her work via TikTok, Instagram, and YouTube with the handle of “brainwavebtch” uses the same technique but with her own software that she created. Brainwavebtch began making her videos years before the Smithsonian did their EEG experiment. Brainwavebtch post videos of herself wearing a headset that scans her brainwaves reactions to songs that she listens to. She began by just wanting to share her work but now takes requests from those who comment on her videos on what they want her brainwaves to react to next and even sells prints of her brainwave scans.
She has made a few videos explaining what the data scans mean. In her brainwave scans, certain colors representing excitement and boredom level. She has even done videos where she shows the live data of her brainwaves reaction to eating certain types of food. This specifically is reminiscent of another modern example of synesthesia in media, Disney’s Ratatouille. In Ratatouille, there is a scene when the main character Remy is eating a berry, and fireworks begin to appear. Then he eats a piece of cheese, and swirls begin. When he takes a bite of each at the same time, he experiences both the fireworks and swirls in his mind. With combing art and science, we might not have been able to create such visualizations.
Art and Science are conventionally pitted against one another, occupying seemingly distant spaces. This distance and opposition can in fact make the intersection and collaboration of art and science a fruitful combination.
ReplyDeleteOne of the most significant intersections is the invention of the Greek alphabet. This event has obvious scientific and philosophical accomplishments; the fabrication of letters separate from any known imagery representing vowels and consonants required great artistic invention. This blend of great scientific and artistic minds warranted arguably the most significant leap in language humanity has seen. Previously, written language consisted of minimal pictures and imagery that could be constructed and spliced together to form meaning. The alphabet broke these concepts into simple components, useless without intense combination but capable of constructing more complex thoughts and ideas. Constructing this means of communication required complete abstraction of all known forms of written language to create something almost entirely new without influence or inspiration. Had the alphabet been more influenced by existing forms of language, it would not have been nearly as effective. In this intersection, artistic simplicity and reduction prevailed.
Another notable meeting between art and science came at the hands of a single 20th-century artist: Pablo Picasso. Picasso’s invention of one of the most abstract and talked-about art styles, Cubism, saw a legitimate visual manipulation of reality. Picasso managed to represent multiple perspectives of one scene or subject within a single painting. He did this by again using reductionism, breaking these subjects down into lines and shapes and flattening their features. Before Picasso invented cubism, art was often focused on replicating our own three-dimensional, highly detailed form of sight. Picasso managed to produce visuals to the 2nd dimension by playing into the natural semi-2D characteristics of a canvas.
Susan Aldworth is a striking contemporary artist who has gained critical acclaim through her use of scientific characteristics within her art. Many of her works expand on the scientific conceptions of the human brain using her own artistic philosophy. In a series of monoprints titled, Out of Body. Aldworth uses instances of electrical or visual imagery taken from brain scans as a representation of our conscious at work. These images are scientific in nature, yet find themselves under the context of an art exhibition. Through Out of Body, Aldworth offers an opportunity for a dialogue between art and science. Out of Body is a very open-ended example of artistic and scientific collaboration, exemplifying it in a manner that includes the viewer in the dialogue.
Another notable work from Aldworth is Cogito Ergo: Chasing Consciousness. This series of digital prints offers a more specific take on the existence of the conscious made visible through the brain. Aldworth seeks to bridge the gap between what a typical MRI might show and what it might not. Through scientific technology we can see neural activity within the brain, but what does that have to do with the person to whom the brain belongs? Aldworth offers glimpses of an answer to this monumental question with soulful and personal imagery embedding itself within the scans. This exemplifies the symbiotic and supplemental nature of art and science, despite their clear distinctions. Art can offer explanations to what science cannot currently answer, and science can offer grounded and plausible interpretations of the imaginative theories art delivers.
I think Leonardo Da Vinci's anatomical drawings would be one of the most successful and most popular intersections of art and science. This is one of the most successful interactions because not only are there multiple drawings of the human body, but there is also text describing the body based on the dissections Da Vinci conducted to gain a better understanding of physiology. The MET's website has a link leading to the book showcasing these drawings from the Royal Library at Windsor Castle. This book shows 50 sheets of drawings divided between different body areas ranging from the internal organs, muscles and skeletons, proportions, and even the reproductive system. I think the collection of drawings is interesting because of how many technological advances we've made since the Renaissance make it seem somewhat primitive. Yet, we can look at very detailed knowledge of the human body from someone who had no medical training or lack thereof.
ReplyDeleteAn artist that’s new to me that I have found who has a successful intersection between art and science is the German artist Julius Von Bismarck. He is an artist known for his interdisciplinary approach, combining art with physics, engineering, and environmental science. In one of his pieces which involves a mix of installation and performance. “Egocentric System” involves a paraboloid-shaped concrete disc, which rotates around its own axis at a speed of fifteen revolutions per minute. At ‘Art Basel Unlimited 2015’, he spent around a week on the spinning platform. Every day, he would do normal routines such as sitting at his desk, reading, eating, lying in bed, and talking on the phone. On his website talking about the work it states that he “serves as the object of an experiment, testing the perceptual and psychological effects of a rotating system in which the force of gravitation is distorted by centrifugal force.”
Another piece that he made “Space Beyond Me” (2010) focuses on the use of the materials and devices of filmmaking to create an experience that involves space and time. In the middle of a dark, round room, a UV projector projects a film clearly dating from another era onto the wall; not only does the projection cover the wall, but the wall is also covered in luminous paint. The projector mimics the movements performed by the camera which he had recorded the film material at that time. He also developed a program that analyzes footage found to accurately determine the original movement of the camera in terms of angle rotation and zoom. Using a modified 16mm camera it carries out the different motions as if it were choreographed like a dance. The viewer’s perception is supposed to engage with the landscape glowing on the walls of the projection space to translate this surface back into three spatial dimensions independent of time. During the experience two films are shown: the first film shows a naked man who seems to be lost in the desert, and the second film which seems to be from the mid-twentieth century shows scenes displaying everyday life in a Spanish village.
Art and science are nowadays considered to be the polar opposites of one another. The concept of the “right and left brain” has created the notion that people have a natural predisposition to one or the other. However, this line of thinking is inherently flawed. Why? Simply because we forget that the “left and right brain” are two halves which make up something everyone has: a brain. People contain multitudes, and they need not limit themselves to one side of a spectrum. The idea of a “Renaissance Man” (a label popularized by Leonardo Da Vinci’s life and achievements) has died out in the modern age, as people become more pigeonholed in their studies. A good example of the “death” of the renaissance man is how education is handled in contemporary times. Until age eighteen, you are put into compulsory education, which teaches you a variety of subjects varying from art and english to science and history. (Unless you attended my middle school, which had art class once a month, science once a week, and a daily class on “religion.”) However, once you reach college or any further education, you are forced to pick one subject on which to devote your life and studies to. There is the alleged “general education” that all college students are required to complete, but that isn’t really a second area of study so much as part two of high school. A question that must be brought up is, Has anyone successfully been a Renaissance Man since the actual Renaissance ended?
ReplyDeleteOf course, there have been people. The most appropriate answer that comes to mind is Santiago Ramón y Cajal, known as the father of modern neuroscience. Born in 1852, he was the first Spanish person to win a Nobel Prize. One might not assume that such a scientifically-minded man would have once had aspirations to work as an artist, but that is exactly what Ramon y Cajal’s goal was in his youth. He was talented when it came to illustration and painting, as well as having a general disregard for authority. However, all of this was discouraged by his father, who steered him towards a more stable career in medicine. Ramon y Cajal still used his artistic talents in his new vocation, and they are actually what ultimately earned him his Nobel Prize. His illustrations (drawn using the reference of a microscope) of the neurons inside the brain are both beautiful and informative, allowing us to see the interconnectedness of how it works. Ramon y Cajal’s illustrations are still used in medical school today, helping teach the next generation.
Continuing on the topic of neuroscience, Susan Aldworth is a part of the aforementioned next generation who utilizes the brain within her works. Her pieces, known as “Brainscapes”, are portraits that she created while on residency at the London Royal hospital. These were a collaboration with Nigel Oxley, who helped turn her illustrations into etchings. Aldworth considers these portraits to be of the very essence of the patients, linked to their personal identities. Comparing Aldworth’s work with that of Ramon y Cajal’s, it is interesting to see how the development of technology over the years has affected how the brain is seen by both the artist and the scientist. After all, there really isn’t a huge difference between these two jobs.
Some of the most successful intersections of art and science are in various areas like medical visualization, architecture, neuroscience, space exploration, etc. These areas demonstrate both creativity and understanding, making complex concepts more accessible and engaging. Fields such as data visualization and medical illustration, artistic techniques help clarify scientific information, improving communication and education. In all these areas, the relationship between art and science is symbiotic, where art interprets and communicates science, and science provides the foundation and tools for artistic innovation.
ReplyDeleteA historical example of the intersection between art and science is the work of Santiago Ramón y Cajal, a Spanish neuroscientist, and pathologist specializing in neuroanatomy and the central nervous system In the late 19th and early 20th centuries, Cajal used his artistic abilities to create detailed illustrations of neurons and brain structures based on his observations through a microscope. These drawings were not only scientifically accurate but also remarkably beautiful, capturing the complexity of the brain's architecture in ways that early photography could not. Cajal’s artistic background allowed him to visualize and communicate the intricate structures of neurons, leading to his discovery of the neuron doctrine—the idea that neurons are the fundamental units of the nervous system. His illustrations remain iconic and are still used in neuroscience education today, demonstrating how artistic skill can enhance scientific discovery and communication. Cajal's ability to combine art and science revolutionized our understanding of the brain and helped establish modern neuroscience.
A contemporary artist that is a great example of this is Bruce Riley. Bruce Riley is a contemporary American artist known for his mesmerizing abstract resin paintings. Based in Chicago, Riley creates intricate, colorful works that explore organic shapes and fluid dynamics, often evoking microscopic biological processes or cosmic patterns. His unique process involves layering resin with pigments, paint, and other materials, allowing them to interact in unpredictable ways. This technique results in a dynamic, almost three-dimensional effect, with his works appearing as if they are in constant motion. Riley’s paintings are described as a blend of control and chaos. He states, “There’s a drama to the unfolding of my paintings. They’re the information gleaned from an engaged connection to mystery. All my work is about that connection. My technique is one of experimentation and evolution relying on accident as much as intent. It’s a process driven technique.” His art stands out for its vivid colors and textures, often reminiscent of cellular structures, biological forms, or even psychedelic imagery. Bruce Riley's work embodies the intersection of art and science, as he explores themes of organic growth, and the unpredictable beauty found in nature's forms. The interaction between the materials introduces an element of spontaneity, making each piece feel alive and constantly evolving. His vivid color palettes and intricate details draw viewers in, encouraging deep contemplation and a sense of wonder at the natural, fluid beauty of his creations.
ReplyDeleteAlthough art and science have been intertwined for thousands of years, they have been pitted against each other in a confrontation between the “right brain” and the “left brain”; the implication that these 2 sects of human capability and knowledge are oppositely charged is misleading. Artists and scientists alike are innovators, discoverers, and researchers, but they are also similar in that they use what they know (and their skill sets) as means of communicating their experiences and explaining the world around them; artists often draw how they feel or how they interpret an environment, whereas scientists work to try to explain the plethora of Earthly phenomena that have yet to be understood.
Many artists in the past were also scientists or innovators, such as Leonardo Da Vinci, Samuel Morse, and Maria Sibylla Merian, who all utilized their practices in an artistic yet scientifically grounded and explanatory way. Amongst the works I’ve seen, Maria Sibylla Merian’s work stands out to me the most as the most compelling historical example of the intersection of art and science, as I find that her artwork is the most even combination of art and science. Known as an entomologist, naturalist, and scientific illustrator, it was quite literally Merian’s job to visually depict scientific processes through her artwork, in a way that properly maintains factual evidence and aesthetic value; a stunning example of this is her piece Metamorphosis Insectorum Surinamensium (1705), an illustration depicting the metamorphosis of both the moth Arsenura armida and the tree, Erythrina fusca. The many phases of life of both organisms are drawn on the same plane as if all different forms of each organism co-existing in a beautiful map displaying their conception and their evolution. It’s informative, creative, and so visually communicative that a written explanation is hardly necessary to understand the subject and purpose of the piece.
There are dozens of artists today who still combine art and science, and given how much more information we have about our world, as well as the huge advancements in technology and craft, combining the two (art and science) has never been more exciting. One artist in particular that caught my eye is Luke Jerram, a British installation artist who makes gigantic glass installations and sculptures that look like biological organisms, in a series he calls “Glass Microbiology;” wherein he creates huge clear glass organisms and cells. Due to his colorblindness, Jerram’s work tries to lay an emphasis on work that can be perceived “across all of our senses”(Bogatz), in a way that prioritizes inclusive appreciation for art and science. It is important to note however that he also does make colored sculptures and installations, including a massive Earth replica (1.8 million times smaller than the Earth) called Gaia. His pieces are powerful due to their grandeur and magnificence, they bring a light to the significance of microorganisms and their unrecognized beauty, hence making them digestible and enjoyable to audiences of all kinds of backgrounds and senses.
Mini Work Cited:
Bogatz, Timothy. “11 Fascinating Artists Inspired by Science.” The Art of Education University, 26 Oct. 2017, theartofeducation.edu/2017/10/11-fascinating-artists-inspired-science/. Accessed 9 Sept. 2024.
When considering the intersection of art and science, there is a common misconception that these two fields of study and ways of thinking could not be more different. Art is often described as being rooted in science and knowledge, having procedural steps similar to the way that scientists hypothesize and test their ideas through trial and error. In simple terms, art can visually depict the why and science considers the how, but the line between science and art often becomes blurred as one relies on the other to convey ideas and discoveries. Science is often not as accessible to everyone which requires art to be a visual depiction of these ideas, almost a transition of these scientific findings and discoveries. Leonardo da Vinci and Albrecht Dürer are great examples of artists who also had a background and fascination with science. Leonardo da Vinci’s fascination with the human body and the anatomy behind these forms made him interested in conveying these ideas visually and playing with the way our eyes perceive these drawings/paintings through light and optics. The most famous example of Leonardo Di Vinci exploring both art and science in his practice was the piece titled “The Vitruvian Man” created in 1492 which is meant to determine human proportionality but also symbolize humans' relativity to the earth. He used his artistic practice and visual understanding to convey the perfect ratios he found anatomically within the human body. This was where we first saw a bridge between science, mathematics, and art as medicine advanced and medical discoveries were made and conveyed to the public.
ReplyDeleteAnother historical example that bridges the gap between art and science, is Jacques Gautier D’Agoty who is known for his piece titled “Anatomical Angel” which was created during the 18th century helping people visualize scientific discoveries surrounding human anatomy and depicting human forms in the way scientists perceive them. These connect to artistic styles of cubism and neoclassicism which emphasized a depiction of reality through geometric shapes or mathematical understandings of the things around us. Pablo Picasso is a wonderful example of an artist who explored cubism in their work specifically in the painting titled, “Les Demoiselles d’Avignon” in 1907 where he used mathematical theory to depict his perception of reality and what was in front of him.
After researching contemporary artists who are continuing to bridge the gap between art and science. I stumbled upon work by Andrew Carnie, a UK-based artist with a background in both art and science who uses his expertise in both fields to demonstrate the wonder and curiosity he found in science through his art. The series I Thought So by Andrew Carnie fascinated me based on the materials he used and the execution of these scientific concepts in an artistic form. He created a series of drawings on plastic using ink and explored themes of neurology and the way our brain is changing/adapting. Within the exhibition, Somnatium was a sleep project studying the body, mind, and specific biological processes that occur in the brain. He used mixed media, sculpture, and transfers to convey these ideas therefore creating a visual experience for the viewer specifically in the piece titled Rhythm which used light and negative space to create an immersive experience for the viewer. Based on the historical findings of artists dating back decades and contemporary art, it is evident that artists and scientists problem-solve concepts in similar manners concluding that you can’t have art without science or science without art.
When depicting the intersection of art and science one of the most historical examples comes from Leonardo da Vinci in “Vitruvian Man” (1490). This is a classic example of using the science of human anatomy in order to portray the human man in an artistic manner. A quote from him that is very applicable is: “Study the science of art. Study the art of science. Develop your senses – learn how to see. Realize that everything connects to everything else.” Da Vinci was truly ahead of his time in thinking about art and science as connected and almost developed the concept that one cannot be created without the other. Art is constantly using scientific methods in order to continue to innovate and science would not be here without an artistic mindset developing new hypotheses and theories. Learning how to see is being able to use all avenues of your brain to see the world for what it is, which is always art and science being intersected.
ReplyDeleteA modern example of an artist intersecting art and science is Jen Stark who makes paper structures as well as does some drawing and animation. From first glance at her website, there is a lot of work done with optical illusion and color to produce paper sculptures. She draws from patterns in nature of wormholes and sliced anatomy while taking an interest in mathematics, topography, etc. Without data and visual descriptions and representations of scientific anomalies her art would not be realistic. An intense depiction is made in her 2014 work Inside Out, that uses acid free paper, foam board, wood, acrylic paint, and varnish in order to inject a large amount of color into a life size black hole. Black holes are often considered scary due to the unknown nature and darkness to them but Inside Out channels elements of beauty and symmetry. The use of optical illusion in her work has to be thought out methodically in order to be done correctly and neatly.
My interpretation of the intersection of art and science is literally how the world functions is completely connected and art and science tend to have some very different qualities but need each other in order to produce amazing work. Every innovative scientific invention going back to even just the light bulb was formed through an innovative idea that no one had thought of before, almost as if creativity is a driving force that connects art and science. Ask someone who takes classes in both art and science departments here at Chapman, I am constantly using both avenues in my school work. When thinking about a project in a studio class it is important to think logically to know if I can complete something timely and efficiently as well as have access to the materials to do so. In lab classes I will tend to think more methodically but understand when I get stuck on a paper, project, problem, etc. that having a creative mindset to problem solve is essential.
There are many different ways in which artists have successfully integrated science into their works. Despite often being put up against each other, art and science are two fields that are deeply similar in processes and output, which has resulted in countless successful integrations of the two practices into a single body of work.
ReplyDeleteFor the historical example, I chose to focus in on Santiago Ramón y Cajal. Born in the northern regions of Spain in 1852, Cajal was known for his invaluable contributions to neuroscience and pathology, with his investigations into the human nervous system and brain structure becoming foundational blocks within modern neuroscience and even winning him the Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine in 1906. Growing up as a rather skilled artist swiftly translated into his scientific works, where he made hundreds of intricate ink and pencil illustrations of neural networks, brain cells and regions, and the arborizations of brain cells. His illustrations of the inner workings of our brains were so accurate that they are still used to this day for educational purposes, printed into textbooks and disseminated throughout the scientific community, ecades on from when they were first drawn. For example, his untitled drawing of a complex, fanned out Purkinje cell from the human cerebellum shows a vast and deep understanding of the neural networks that give us the ability to walk and stand.
For my contemporary example, I decided to try to look for an artist that is a little less literal and a bit more conceptual in practice. I stumbled upon the work of Janet Saad-Cook, who is an Ohio-born American artist who creates multidisciplinary work that drives to fuse various natural phenomena like sunlight, light reflection, and time into art. In a practice that she refers to as “Sun Drawing”, Saad-Cook sets up various metal and glass objects in a space positioned within a sunlight source (usually a window), which reflects colorful and dynamic designs onto adjacent walls, that slowly adjust and morph throughout the day depending on the positioning of the sun in the sky. This morphing can be observed in specific pieces like Ortus, a single sun drawing that is constantly shifting and warping into new shapes based on the angle of the sun in the sky, depending on the time of day.
These two artists from two different periods both intersect art in science in vastly different but equally successful ways. Cajal’s precise and objective depictions of the inner workings of the human brain and nervous system represent a literal and stunning fusion of scientific research depicted in hundreds of pencil and ink drawings, showing the intricate and sprawling neural networks and the cells that make up our most vital organ, while Saad-Cook’s much more conceptual approach in setting up reflective structures to catch and cast sunlight onto walls in abstract and colorful ways. Both artists show that art and science can intermingle and come together in vastly different means, but ultimately reach similarly successful outcomes that highlight the interactions between the two practices.
A historical account of the intersection of art and science is the work by Ernst Haeckel. Haeckel, a 19th century artist, was a German biologist, naturalist, and artist who tended to both an artistic and scientific approach in his work. Haeckel is most known for his contribution to marine life, through his series "Art Forms in Nature.” This project illustrates the complexities of symmetrical patterns found on aquatic organisms such as: jellyfish, radiolarians, and sea anemones. This series captured the aesthetic beauty of these creatures, but also provides a detailed and comprehensive study of these animals. A study that can be appreciated by all artists and scientists alike. These illustrations highlight the diverse, yet repeated forms and structures of marine animals, as well as formulate notions about the overlaps between science and art. Haeckel work dissolves and bridges art and science through meticulously researched, and detailed observations, represented through beautifully crafted illustrations.
ReplyDeleteA contemporary example of an artist who captures the intersections of art and science is Heather Dewey-Hagborg. Heather Dewey-Hagborg is a biochemist and artist,who uses art and science materially, and conceptually as she explores the relationship between genetics and identity. One of her recent projects, "Stranger Visions,” wonderfully combines science and art. "Stranger Visions” consists of multiple processes including:collecting used items from strangers, extrapolating DNA from the samples, and creating 3-D modeling faces based on the collected DNA. Through this process Dewey-Hagborg is able to imagine what these strangers look like, all from the remnants of DNA left on their trash. Dewey-Hagborg’s process merges the artistic and scientific processes through her methods of genetic analysis, and the interpretation of these analyses. These genetic replicas question the realities of genetic misuse, and one's privacy and ownership of their DNA. “Stranger Visions,” also comments on the hackability of DNA, in comparison to technology. She speaks on the need for society to evaluate the implications of emerging technology, as well as the mining of genetics and data. Dewey-Hagborg also brings attention to the ongoing conversation of the meshing of art and artificial intelligence.
These examples highlight the necessity to use both methodology and art processes, as neither project would exist without the use of both art and science. Furthermore, it's interesting that both utilize the scientific method to create a result, yet in an unconventional way. The two artists play to similarities of each discipline, as science and art are both built from research and experimentation. However, art makes the initiative to create a visualization, or illustration of ‘data’ and research. Art and science both strive to elicit a result or reaction, however, they are not typically perceived to exist in the same realm. As artificial intelligence and art continue to coexist, I believe art and science will be more accepted as an intertwined discipline.